WHAT IS NOT SAID IN THE interpellation of Minister El Aissami (I) THAT THE VICE
F t was 7 hours of questioning, just go for the first part ... continue ... and now it is the Minister Tarek El Aissami.
Above all I must say that even if the said minister has not to my liking I recognize his ability for speech and successful as it has been conceived security policy. Among the things that have always called my attention is the fact that precisely according to figures from the Government, including more states violent, are only those whose population is mostly of opposition. Called my attention because in the case of Zulia, for example, one of the major factors that we award this situation, among other things, is a border state status and population density it has. But nevertheless, in the case of Táchira, historically characteristics are similar to those of Zulia, the level of uncertainty has only increased in recent years, soaring like Lara has also experienced. Deputy Mendoza
stated, inter alia, the implementation of 16 security plans which no results have been obtained because the numbers of homicides. down. Before this question came out to the Minister pointing out that precisely the deployment of 16 security plans showing the government's interest to address the issue of security. However I would say to the Minister that actually 16 security plans show the government's intention to address the problem of insecurity, but the fact that 15 of these plans have failed to reflect his government's inefficiency and lack of political will to effectively those plans. Another aspect
said Rep. Mendoza was regarding the "recycling" of officials involved in crimes by the police. In this regard the Minister noted that the GNP was acting effectively on the subject but at the time indicated that he was a co-responsibility "and mask Governors police officers who are identified as violators of human rights and are active officers of the Corps Police. " In this regard I would note 3 specific situations and individuals, which of course no one in the chamber referred. I would ask for example, according to police legal heads of regional and municipal police must be supported by his office as the governing body of the police function, explains how that the current Director of Police of San Francisco is a former police officer dismissed from the Police Regional Zulia state? We also ask that in the context of this co-responsibility that reference to what role they would play the Superior Courts in Administrative, courts and even the Supreme Court issued rulings that daily order reinstatement of dismissed officers of the Police Forces on pain of having verified the commission of the offenses alleged against him and under erroneous judgments on alleged procedural defects impose formalities on the actual facts? Finally, I would ask, by extending Gen. question Mata Figueroa, whether within this co-responsibility should it not also involved the intelligence services, especially in military matters, and how to explain that today there are large number of officers attached to DIM linked to criminal acts such as extortion and collection of shots and even short of police officers also regional and even open inquiry?. Meanwhile
Congresswoman Iris Varela, somewhat misplaced chose to bring up the hackneyed story of April 11 and even quoting Carmona and Mezherani ... however incoherent in his speech made reference to three really important things, which no one in the chamber seems to have given importance. First, proposed "Discuss the causes of insecurity in Venezuela" in this regard the Minister noted further that the violence "was the product of exclusion, poverty, lack of opportunities, lack of education, values, denial of access to services and basic needs "and in fact agree with the Minister about the criminogenic factors that generate violence, which the Minister seems to forget is that his government has had for 12 years an opportunity to reduce the negative impact of these factors through effective and consistent policies aimed at providing a better quality of life for Venezuelans within which are embedded all these criminogenic factors. So that even though the Minister omitted this detail, I do let me tell Rep. Varela, that while the Minister is right when he says that we are heirs to a culture of violence, the fact remains that for 12 years his government has deepened not only criminogenic factors that generate violence, but also the head of state has been the champion of violent speech, offensive and disrespectful that has deepened the confrontation between Venezuela and impunity at all levels.
The second issue addressed Rep. Varela, which in my opinion was more that immoral, offensive, was to ask the Minister for Disarmament policy of early release, which is not mentioned and no one was kind enough to remind you, is that the AN outgoing and she was part of the ruling party had absolute majority, refused to approve the bill for Disarmament than the Ministry of Interior and Justice proposed in October 2010, whose text has been one of the most innovative and successful has been submitted for consideration by the Assembly. Indeed Disarmament Plan is not limited to an Act, but do not be a lawyer to know that the legal framework is a starting point for any plan or policy intended seriously and coherently developed in any area Public policies that the State later. Another interesting aspect discussed was the proposal by Rep. disarmament of the upper class, I really thought between all the most absurd of his speech. Maybe you forgot the deputy, that those who commit crimes are not just the upper class, whether we like it or not, the vast majority of people who commit crimes belong to lower social strata, so that the disarmament of the upper class safety plan would be a complement to disarmament, because if there is increased acquisition of arms by upper-class people is not to rob or kill, but this reflected the need to preserve their life, even when statistically the result is otherwise. So what, would be irresponsible to take on other disarmament priority of social class and not base the priority on those in which statistically has a higher incidence of purchase of weapons involved in crimes. But I would have gone further, I would have asked why the Minister for Disarmament Plan proposed so far not articulated a plan effective disarmament of our prisons?
For now we leave it up to here ... http://www.blogalaxia.com/tagmaker.php
0 comments:
Post a Comment