Sorto Francisco Rivas
Economist, specialist in Public Policy Management
fran.sorto @ gmail.com
Public institutions are important because they are run through public policies designed by the Government to address collective needs, for various reasons, require state intervention to ensure their overall satisfaction level, but this does have to provide all services in administrative law, are considered public nature, but is obliged to promote their provision.
In some cases, due to budgetary constraints, political decision or some sort of institutional failure, the State dealers providing public services, for which regulates its supply, it emits the condition acts for third parties to assume the task of providing and also emits the legal acts necessary for the recognition of rights to dealers, which can not be arbitrarily restricted in the future, not compensate for the loss or restriction of the rights that were granted (certainty).
Inclusive, the State must ensure that the requirements for additional services to public policies, but private in nature, are consistent with certain quality standards, otherwise the state may be restricted to their private benefit, even if not used public funds for such purposes, such is the case of private educational institutions which, when evaluated by the Ministry of Education may be unable to operate because they do not meet the minimum requirements for providing educational services, within certain parameters, the same goes for the institutions providing private health services, which must be accredited to supervisory boards, the same applies to financial institutions.
Depending on the severity and extent of collective problems and priorities are involved in government plans and the strategic importance of the institutions responsible for managing specific public policies. Since the visibility of the problems change over time, thanks to the success or failure of policies implemented for their care, the strategic importance of public institutions also change as you adjust the ontology of the problem that demanded its creation .
is for this reason that institutions like the armed forces, for example, tend to grow in times of conflict and threats to national sovereignty, or when crime increases, the entities responsible for internal security requirements should be re-allocated to time, whereas, when the severity and extent of collective needs are controlled, the institutions that administer policies in these areas, usually shrink to free resources and use them well, in other social priorities.
is for this reason that when new programs are promoted, or redefine existing ones, the institutions responsible for administering the policies that have given them life, they suffer some kind of transformation, in addition, these changes tend to reveal, at a time, which areas are essential for the government, reinforcing the institutions responsible for projects and strategic programs and are taking a backseat to those groups involved on minor problems (less serious).
In any case, it is necessary to look at the missions of the institutions that receive more support in order to identify where the Government's strategic bets, if public health is important for it, go more resources to institutions related to the portfolio of State and promote institutional strengthening, if the concern is the health of financial institutions, strengthen the regulatory powers of the credit institutions and recruitment of public savings in the country.
Hence, to get an idea of \u200b\u200bthe orientation of the government plans not only have to look at the speeches, we see public policies enacted, the budgetary resources that support The organizational design that rests its implementation and guide the institutions through which they seek to promote.
0 comments:
Post a Comment