Small Black Gauges For Guys

Cruz Vigil May 7 - Attorney



Mindful Greetings!

Hope you are well, that I write concern has emerged to organize a vigil on Friday May 7 against the Attorney General. This organ of State has appealed before the Administrative Tribunal (ACT) asking that logging is reactivated. The TCA stopped the works to clarify these processes and the Office is taking the ruling of the Constitutional Court as a basis to say that this is of national interest, defending the interests of the state, which as we know, are anything but environmental. Here the link to this information: http://kioscosambientales.ucr.ac.cr/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=270:procuraduria-pide-reactivar-tala-en-crucitas&catid=40 : news-environment & Itemid = 60

The details of the activity are:

Where: Attorney General's Office. Avenidas 2 and 6, Calle 13.

When: Friday May 7, from 4:00 pm until you drop!


invite you to be as creative as possible and to mobilize the greatest number of people, because we have little time. Music, food to share between us, candles, posters, banners, blankets ... To identify get dressed in green, as an environmental claim. If anyone has any other environmental protest (Diquis, Piñero, Mining in Osa, Petroleum Exploration Attempts / gold in Talamanca, Threat to Maritime Terrestrial Zone, Sardinal and others) that occurred during this administration INVITED TO THIS ACTIVITY. The idea is to be a lot ...

... with the face but the body Crucitas ENVIRONMENTAL

Which Tamil Actress Has Biggest Boobs

What should never say on Crucitas SENARA Manager

• Miguel Ramírez Hernández (*)

In the extensive record Crucitas (21 volumes) have sought and have found nowhere a technical study SENARA officials to endorse the mining project located in Las Crucitas. Greatly surprised that the President of the Constitutional Court, Ana Virginia Calzada, say to the media that the project has the backing of SENARA, when this is totally false and not resting on any technical document SENARA. La Sala IV was induced in error by a note signed by Mr. Bernal Soto Zuniga, Manager of SENARA (volume 3707 folio XI V), saying that official a document which, as manager, "endorse" the study of a company hired by the developer of the project Crucitas, but these have been endorsed and corroborated field visit by technical staff of the institution. In the case of a mining project of this importance, which also provides a depth of 67 meters, in two pits, it is surprising that the technical criteria of our institution has been managed in this way, referring to studies of others. In a note

SUB-543-2008, the Research and Water Management of SENARA, dated December 3, 2008 (folio Volume V 1148), this Office stated "The SENARA no information to define the recharge and discharge areas and the impact of mining on groundwater and surface water. Therefore, it is considered that it takes the development of detailed hydrogeological studies for the assessment of the impacts that mining may have on groundwater, which is estimated to require an estimated time of 10 to 12 months in its execution. " This, in order to have complete information of the status of groundwater in the area of \u200b\u200bCrucitas and evaluate the impact of this mining project. This note was taken by management and transmitted according to the Constitutional Court (folio1143 volume V). However, the resources requested were not for that study, which was never made. We

this respect to recall that the Research and Water Management has never been directly invited to participate or the inspection of the site on September 11, 2009 or the hearing at the Board in November 2009 but Manager "urged" an official of that agency to accompany him. During the inspection even SENARA officials could not enter most of the sites inspected due to lack of coordination with the security services of the Company Infinite Gold, so that the magistrates in charge of the inspection did not have a hydrogeologist SENARA to address questions during this visit of recognition. And we must also note that SENARA Manager, an agronomist by profession, was the one who answered most of the doubts of Mr. and Mrs. Judge during the hearing in November 2009. This procedure clearly contrary to a recommendation of the Comptroller General of the Republic (Report DFOE-PGAA-11-2009 of July 17, 2009) which, when it became apparent inconsistencies between the statement made by the Technical and Management SENARA this institution in the case of aquifers in coastal areas, specifically warned that "the Research and Water Management / ... / corresponds to communicate through the media and established formal channels, studies, criteria and recommendations to the appropriate, without it means to be subject to approval or review in informal technical and administrative bodies, as if the management or the Board "(p. 10 of the aforementioned report.)

Therefore, as a Costa Rican official of this institution unbecoming categorically stated by Mr. Manager SENARA on Crucitas mining project. I affirm without fear that the Research and Water Management, there is no technical study conducted by the Directorate, and this was never directly called to give their views during the inspection on site or at the hearing held in November 2009. Respectfully but publicly urge Mr. Manager quoting the folio number in the 21 volumes of records of the Constitutional Court that has a technical review of our institution approved by the Research and Water Management to endorse the Crucitas mining project in entirety.

*

SENARA Officer

Pinnacle Tvcenter No Sound

Statement of organized groups in Nicaragua to the resolution of the Constitutional Court in the case Crucitas

We (as), representatives of Central Humboldt River Foundation, Project socio
(PROSOC) by Leo and Sons of the Rio, we wish to
to rule on the proposed open pit mining "Crucitas." WHEREAS
:
I
IV The Constitutional Chamber of Costa Rica, has delivered on April 16, 2010, a failure
which dismisses the writ of amparo filed by the partner Edgardo Araya UNOVA
against the Declaration of Convenience
Public Interest and National Project open pit mining "Crucitas company Industrias Infinito SA
located Cutris of San Carlos, province of Alajuela, just 5 miles
the south bank of Rio San Juan de Nicaragua .

II
This open pit mining project, will result in possible damages to the water course and surrounding
located in the San Juan River, due to possible
sedimentation processes will adversely affect these ecosystems and their biodiversity
in the quality of its waters, navigation,
landscape quality and eco-tourism potential of this area.
III
The Government of Costa Rica by this decision taken by the magistrates of the Sala IV
, highlights once again the double standard that is handled, wherein a portion
proclaiming peace with nature, and moreover , is allowed to run
an activity that involves the degradation of ecosystems and the effect on the
populations depend on them.

IV Respecting the rights of others is peace, and to maintain harmony and good living
border towns is important for States to use
"Precautionary Principle", and also ensure that activities within their jurisdictions
not cause damage to biological diversity from a third party, as quoted
the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (Art. 3),
Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, United Nations
(Principle 15) and the Convention on Biodiversity and Protection of Priority Wild Areas in Central America
(Art. 2).
THEREFORE
1
1. Categorically condemn and reject the ruling of the Constitutional Court Constitutional
of Costa Rica declared the amparo application
against the declaration of public interest and national convenience
Crucitas Mining project developed by the Industrias Infinito SA, becoming
case ignore the many technical and legal questions have been raised by different actors
Costa Ricans and Nicaraguans and
knowing that such a project will alter the nature and way affect
negative and irreversible ecosystem.
2. We sympathize and support all actions undertaken by
control organizations in Costa Rica trying to stop an imminent environmental disaster
when you start mining gold in the open in that area
.
3. We urge the Government of Nicaragua, to intervene in the matter, to be
sue the State of Costa Rica for possible violations of international environmental
that compromise the sovereignty of the country, the Community
right to live in a healthy environment and that the activity carried out
this country does not cause damage to third parties.
4. We demand compliance with the Resolution on
mining concessions in the San Juan River Basin and the open-pit mining project "Crucitas"
which was adopted last September 23, 2009, by the Legislature of
Nicaragua, which are requested to Costa Rican legislators,
review and repeal of the legislative decree declaring the public interest and national convenience
Mining Project Crucitas. Like calls to
Government of Nicaragua to review policies and granting promotions
mining concessions in the San Juan River Basin, adapting existing legislation in this area
to prevent the installation and operation of companies
that can contaminate the environment and cause irreversible damage to these ecosystems.
5. Manifest inconsistency in policies that dictate the governments of Costa Rica and Nicaragua
, as far from the reality we live today, where on one hand
conventions and agreements signed in
Central conservation of biodiversity and the environment and on the other hand, licenses and concessions granted
of mining activities, which clearly
known harmful effects to the natural resources they say should be protected
.
6. We call on the national organization and mobilization as a key means
curb conducting mining activities in the basin of the Rio San Juan
.
Since the City of Managua, on the 19th day of April 2010.
2
>