If offense, but in this country it seems that justice and law are two entirely different, often antagonistic, as Montesquieu said "A thing is not just for the fact to be law. It should be law because it is just. "
To this we add that the technicalities and procedures are more important than the same laws, then we have an idea of \u200b\u200bhow we are.
is inconceivable that criminals go free from legalism, that was not read rights, which had already passed the period of flagrante delicto, the police violated a procedure that ; prosecutor did not sign a document, get the idea?
The fact that an official mistake in a process, sometimes on purpose, does not absolve the criminal of the crime. Why is not the official processes for these omissions? That would be a good incentive to be more careful at work.
If our judicial system does not do justice, someone else will. In Guatemala, especially in the interior, public lynchings are common criminals, not justified, it is illegal, but it is effective. Will we have to go to these extremes?
I make a proposal, since the judiciary is the third branch of government, why not submit to public election of judges? What if every judge must give the public accounts of their actions? Is not it more fair?
Aristotle said that to know send it, we need to know to obey, that it will fall to public officials to follow this principle.
are things that happen in third world countries ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment