Tascon ...
Loved by some, hated by others and betrayed by many Luis Tascon be remembered as an emblematic figure of the century polarized Venezuela XXI. Tascon was a man who could say, among other things, that was a strong advocate of the left and firm believer in the Revolution, who lived according to his ideas, which until the end were his guide. A man who bet everything on a revolution that involved a real transformation of the state in all variables, but eventually had to concede that goal in 11 years of government had failed. Still refused to give up his ideal of the country and struggle to build a real home. Many agree
considered the most representative icon of the apartheid regime imposed by the Venezuelan President Chavez from the process of collecting signatures to approve the Recall Referendum of 2004. Was charged directly by the political persecution that was generated with the list, while he became the target of the most severe attack by the Venezuelan opposition and those who directly or indirectly, to date, continue to face discrimination policy for having signed against the president in 2004.
No doubt Tascon list was for a double-edged sword, that the first change, made him the liking and beneplacencia the President, who always considered the leader of a revolution that would lead our country to move towards true social transformation of the state, a project that moved all without hesitation, even its name, being declared sole parent of a list that did not beget, because if you remember, the database of the signatories was published SUMATE that was the agency responsible manage the collection process, as well as being broadcast by Globovision through its website and which can have free access through a sms to 8080. Still did not hesitate to take paternity leave, as he said, assuming responsibility for the good and bad that it would derive. Unfortunately the Tascon list was converted into a weapon of political persecution that went beyond all limits and contributed greatly not only a broken society, but at the same time to the consolidation of an exclusionary regime that made confrontation and hate their best political strategy, hate by the way, everyone at some point we have been party to any of its facets. Unlike many false revolutionaries Tascón lived according to his ideas and loyal to the national project led by President Chavez, committed to the core in the real transformation of the state became one of the staunchest critics of the excesses. And corruption of their own government, which ironically cost him his expulsion from the political party he helped form. Many of those who benefited from that list became the executioners who were the facilitators, experienced firsthand the disrepute by those who once flattered him and those who were "comrades" become his most bitter opponents, enfilar not hesitate to all artillery against them. Ironically, many of these false comrades who turned their backs on the debacle of his political life today so hypocritical and without the slightest hint of decency to criticize the opposition to celebrate his death, other deplorable action, but that certainly has its origin in that hatred exacerbated during 11 years has been planted and harvested in the soul of Venezuelans. At the end Tascón learned to deal with the hatred of the opposition severely beaten and thousands of families who saw him and "his list" the most executioner and therefore their enemy. However, if I could feel something in our conversations was the deep sadness of being betrayed by those who considered his buddies, his comrades and betting everything on a project that never failed to materialize, but above all by the way their leader, the man he admired, which followed, to whom he was always fair, just looked down and paused while the vultures of false Revolution used it as cannon fodder, said in his own words at a time chavez chose between my position and thieves, they won and lost the revolution ... " Still
stood firm in their struggle to build nation, to make a real revolution, with Chavez or not, but ultimately kept the hope to rectify, not had time to tell me if they kept their faith in him or in the end lost as many have already done, but that despite all no grudge against anyone for whom no doubt had become his major executioners. We did not have much time to discuss our differences and positions, but the twitter paved the way and two long interviews or rather conversations were enough to meet the man humble and happy to hide behind the list ... many projects were pending as Infogobierno Act which Cilia Flores y su combo they put so many obstacles after his expulsion from the PSUV, we also stayed pending the visit to the Chamber of the NA, but most of us still pending construction of the country ... still my Pana Tascón that God rest his soul and give peace to your soul, because is that ultimately you may have errors were committed in the name of your revolution and the country that aspired .. Sent from my BlackBerry
Movistar
Saturday, August 14, 2010
Tuesday, August 10, 2010
Rs-9600 Robertshaw Thermostat Manual
The ambitious vision of future green gold
Heidy Murillo Quesada
Vice President - Federation for the Conservation Costaricense Ced
environment. 205220758
At times it is amazing the way as two separate individuals possess university degrees and postgraduate studies, addressing issues of national and international interest in the case that concerns me, the article by Don Humberto Pacheco "Crucitas O CRUZOTAS" leaves no my attention.
Estimating the economic scope of compensation should reconocérsele a mining company in the event of a unilateral breach of the concession for mining Crucitas has no real handle, let alone support a serious analysis of costs, benefits and financial damage derivatives. Mining is estimated, according to public information known, in which 700,000 ounces for a scenario of prices in a favorable market environment can reach $ 1,400 per ounce, which means that the gross sales of the metal may reach $ 980 million. This means that the estimate announced by senior government officials found to be higher by 80% over gross sales for the entire period of exploitation of the gold reserves of the mine. By all means, continue to refer to that amount as true, is irresponsible.
All investments made by the mining to date have been at your own risk, in both who have never had permission to sign, on the grounds that for many years we have not given up contesting in various administrative and judicial means resources have not yet been exhausted.
In a possible application by Gold inifinite to a decision by the national government to prevent mining in Crucitas, it is extremely difficult for transnational achieve a favorable result, as there are different arguments of deep technical strength and decisions have been taken against the grain on the administrative and legal provisions. The final scope of the alleged compensation, compensation should be recognized that the mining company must be set by an international tribunal.
The firm commitment to environmental protection, investment in education and health is what has made our country an example for the rest of the region. We have shown that mining is not necessary to develop, and not me, it is HP's behalf who referred to the quality of the Costa Rican labor with great satisfaction, and tourism, which comes to rest, filled with life, energy and healthy environments to our biodiversity, which has sustained tens of thousands of Costa Ricans, who today can continue their activity because it is sustainable over time, is not exhausted.
Unsustainability which, by definition mining, the exploitation of 10 years only leaves destruction in its wake, where after that time can not perform any other activity is synonymous with "Bread today, hunger tomorrow and it's a foolish bet. In any case, the evidence in the rest of Central America shows that when a mining company withdraws communities are in worse environmental, social and economic than before, and that would cost much higher for the Costa Rican society to promote activities at this time sustainable.
So much so that the cost benefit as a sovereign nation we decide to eradicate the root mining of our country, no doubt, would be positive.
Any decision of the executive power to repeal the decree of public interest and national convenience Crucitas mining project is legal and legitimate process, plus there are plenty of arguments to support it.
face of all these arguments, the fallacy is clearly raising Humberto invoking the argument of "legal security" as opposed to our sovereign decision to expel Infinite Crucitas, supported by 9 out of 10 in Costa Rica. Don Humberto
also refers to arguments based on fear of economic loss for the poorest, Soviet lights parasitic and other epithets converted out of date by at least 20 years when the wall came down and I was 12, as well as a misogynist arguments questioning the decisions of a woman ... No, not worth discussing because they do not come to my height.
Anyway, very concrete evidence about the inconvenience of mining in our country, beginning with the sacrifice of other activities that are environmentally sustainable, socially and economically, this is the basis for sustainable development, as I said before, supported by 9 out of 10 Costa Rican and they do have, contrary to what arises Don Humberto, a very futuristic and very ambitious. So ambitious is that vision, There are many achievements and wealth, which many can not see her in the narrow-minded to earn a return of gold mirrors. Many have progressed, others are condemned to repeat history, we move forward, we are the ones who refuses to make the same mistakes. The visionary and progressive, we see more than gold, green gold see the future.

Heidy Murillo Quesada
Vice President - Federation for the Conservation Costaricense Ced
environment. 205220758
At times it is amazing the way as two separate individuals possess university degrees and postgraduate studies, addressing issues of national and international interest in the case that concerns me, the article by Don Humberto Pacheco "Crucitas O CRUZOTAS" leaves no my attention.
Estimating the economic scope of compensation should reconocérsele a mining company in the event of a unilateral breach of the concession for mining Crucitas has no real handle, let alone support a serious analysis of costs, benefits and financial damage derivatives. Mining is estimated, according to public information known, in which 700,000 ounces for a scenario of prices in a favorable market environment can reach $ 1,400 per ounce, which means that the gross sales of the metal may reach $ 980 million. This means that the estimate announced by senior government officials found to be higher by 80% over gross sales for the entire period of exploitation of the gold reserves of the mine. By all means, continue to refer to that amount as true, is irresponsible.
All investments made by the mining to date have been at your own risk, in both who have never had permission to sign, on the grounds that for many years we have not given up contesting in various administrative and judicial means resources have not yet been exhausted.
In a possible application by Gold inifinite to a decision by the national government to prevent mining in Crucitas, it is extremely difficult for transnational achieve a favorable result, as there are different arguments of deep technical strength and decisions have been taken against the grain on the administrative and legal provisions. The final scope of the alleged compensation, compensation should be recognized that the mining company must be set by an international tribunal.
The firm commitment to environmental protection, investment in education and health is what has made our country an example for the rest of the region. We have shown that mining is not necessary to develop, and not me, it is HP's behalf who referred to the quality of the Costa Rican labor with great satisfaction, and tourism, which comes to rest, filled with life, energy and healthy environments to our biodiversity, which has sustained tens of thousands of Costa Ricans, who today can continue their activity because it is sustainable over time, is not exhausted.
Unsustainability which, by definition mining, the exploitation of 10 years only leaves destruction in its wake, where after that time can not perform any other activity is synonymous with "Bread today, hunger tomorrow and it's a foolish bet. In any case, the evidence in the rest of Central America shows that when a mining company withdraws communities are in worse environmental, social and economic than before, and that would cost much higher for the Costa Rican society to promote activities at this time sustainable.
So much so that the cost benefit as a sovereign nation we decide to eradicate the root mining of our country, no doubt, would be positive.
Any decision of the executive power to repeal the decree of public interest and national convenience Crucitas mining project is legal and legitimate process, plus there are plenty of arguments to support it.
face of all these arguments, the fallacy is clearly raising Humberto invoking the argument of "legal security" as opposed to our sovereign decision to expel Infinite Crucitas, supported by 9 out of 10 in Costa Rica. Don Humberto
also refers to arguments based on fear of economic loss for the poorest, Soviet lights parasitic and other epithets converted out of date by at least 20 years when the wall came down and I was 12, as well as a misogynist arguments questioning the decisions of a woman ... No, not worth discussing because they do not come to my height.
Anyway, very concrete evidence about the inconvenience of mining in our country, beginning with the sacrifice of other activities that are environmentally sustainable, socially and economically, this is the basis for sustainable development, as I said before, supported by 9 out of 10 Costa Rican and they do have, contrary to what arises Don Humberto, a very futuristic and very ambitious. So ambitious is that vision, There are many achievements and wealth, which many can not see her in the narrow-minded to earn a return of gold mirrors. Many have progressed, others are condemned to repeat history, we move forward, we are the ones who refuses to make the same mistakes. The visionary and progressive, we see more than gold, green gold see the future.
Episoden Bulma Und Vegta
The resource curse and poverty
Examples Don Jaime Gutierrez cites in his article "the attic is determined to be poor" on Tuesday, August 3 indicate a lack of knowledge about history and reality in Central America and Panama in relation to of Costa Rica. Costa Rica is a country with virtually no mines and no However, in relative terms is much less poverty than other Central American countries where the mines are open pit gold export decades inherited wealth and poverty. There
countries to expel more youth in the region to Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador, and, however, gold mining in the open is an important part of economic activities in those countries. Costa Rica has no channel, but its indigenous and rural populations have a much higher quality of life for the average Panamanian indigenous and rural population.
megadistrito Panama has a financial and also has first world roads but the 300,000 or more indigenous Ngobe people, inheritors of an ancient cultural wealth are totally excluded from that wealth, live in extreme poverty and many are forced to migrate into Costa Rica in search of decent work. Source
corruption. Maybe Don Jaime has not heard about the "resource curse," an analysis that make international leading economists such as Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz. This man explained that extractive resources often encourage corruption and easy money for an elite and mining-based economy creates "rich countries with poor people" (as in the case of Guatemala and other countries in the region).
also suggests that the prices of extractive products are very volatile and distort or not conducive to an economy based on sustainable production and enrichment of human capital. Such is the case of gold in Costa Rica: when the mining company began managing the project (less than three years) the gold was worth $ 300 per ounce, now Don Alfio Piva, our vice president, estimates irresponsibly unnecessary compensation based on Priced at $ 1,200 per ounce. Perhaps
Don Jaime has not delved into controversial texts such as Don Pepe "The Poverty of Nations" where points about the differences between wealth and money and explains why we consider to plant grains and maintain food sovereignty of a country creates wealth.
Maybe then it would be further explanation of why young people migrate Perez Zeledon: Depending on the maldistribution in the land, favored by the concentration of land in the hands of the corporation pineapple, or the abandonment of our policy of food sovereignty based on agro-ecological systems to the detriment of farmers and institutions much loved by our farmers as they were the CNP, IDA and the MAG itself.
Costa Rica was an exemplary country for the region and the world, its wealth based on a comprehensive educational program on social investment in products produced from the plot peasant agro-ecological systems (coffee, cocoa, grains, tubers, etc.). At the time that the economy transnationalized, when the multinational fruit (pineapple, orange, banana) farm families began to move, when we left to the elements of the alleged "free market" of more than twenty thousand peasant families producing 100% of beans that we ate in the mid 80's, then began to open up the huge gap between rich and poor, and started to centroamericanizarnos. Contempt
. Finally, we should remind Don Jaime when it comes to our biodiversity so contemptuous that it was precisely that biodiversity (these "bugs, Alipate and big birds") that allowed and promoted the initial ecotourism in Costa Rica, which in turn attracted hundreds of thousands of tourists every year who have maintained the country's main industry in the last fifteen years.
Examples Don Jaime Gutierrez cites in his article "the attic is determined to be poor" on Tuesday, August 3 indicate a lack of knowledge about history and reality in Central America and Panama in relation to of Costa Rica. Costa Rica is a country with virtually no mines and no However, in relative terms is much less poverty than other Central American countries where the mines are open pit gold export decades inherited wealth and poverty. There
countries to expel more youth in the region to Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador, and, however, gold mining in the open is an important part of economic activities in those countries. Costa Rica has no channel, but its indigenous and rural populations have a much higher quality of life for the average Panamanian indigenous and rural population.
megadistrito Panama has a financial and also has first world roads but the 300,000 or more indigenous Ngobe people, inheritors of an ancient cultural wealth are totally excluded from that wealth, live in extreme poverty and many are forced to migrate into Costa Rica in search of decent work. Source
corruption. Maybe Don Jaime has not heard about the "resource curse," an analysis that make international leading economists such as Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz. This man explained that extractive resources often encourage corruption and easy money for an elite and mining-based economy creates "rich countries with poor people" (as in the case of Guatemala and other countries in the region).
also suggests that the prices of extractive products are very volatile and distort or not conducive to an economy based on sustainable production and enrichment of human capital. Such is the case of gold in Costa Rica: when the mining company began managing the project (less than three years) the gold was worth $ 300 per ounce, now Don Alfio Piva, our vice president, estimates irresponsibly unnecessary compensation based on Priced at $ 1,200 per ounce. Perhaps
Don Jaime has not delved into controversial texts such as Don Pepe "The Poverty of Nations" where points about the differences between wealth and money and explains why we consider to plant grains and maintain food sovereignty of a country creates wealth.
Maybe then it would be further explanation of why young people migrate Perez Zeledon: Depending on the maldistribution in the land, favored by the concentration of land in the hands of the corporation pineapple, or the abandonment of our policy of food sovereignty based on agro-ecological systems to the detriment of farmers and institutions much loved by our farmers as they were the CNP, IDA and the MAG itself.
Costa Rica was an exemplary country for the region and the world, its wealth based on a comprehensive educational program on social investment in products produced from the plot peasant agro-ecological systems (coffee, cocoa, grains, tubers, etc.). At the time that the economy transnationalized, when the multinational fruit (pineapple, orange, banana) farm families began to move, when we left to the elements of the alleged "free market" of more than twenty thousand peasant families producing 100% of beans that we ate in the mid 80's, then began to open up the huge gap between rich and poor, and started to centroamericanizarnos. Contempt
. Finally, we should remind Don Jaime when it comes to our biodiversity so contemptuous that it was precisely that biodiversity (these "bugs, Alipate and big birds") that allowed and promoted the initial ecotourism in Costa Rica, which in turn attracted hundreds of thousands of tourists every year who have maintained the country's main industry in the last fifteen years.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)