According to the GNB Gen. Antonio Benavides dead in clashes with police forces can not be included in casualty rates because of the insecurity, because their mode to see the fate of a criminal is jail or underground.
try to condense all the ideas that went through my mind to avoid leaving any out .. and they were so many that are not as spinning them without losing perspective, so that will depart from some premises that I believe contain the background that lies behind his remarks ...
Inconsistency: inconsistency from every point of view, because the mere fact of approaching death as a departure and is inconsistent with the "alleged" humanist essence of this pseudo socialism. But coupled with this, the discourse also disrupts the humanization of the police and prisons to the Minister El Aissami adopted the slogan of taking the position as the office of Interior and Justice. But beyond the contradictions arising of any process, safety is certainly counterproductive, since it exposes to the public so far have failed to define clearly and precisely the principles that guide the policies of security.
In addition to the manifest inconsistency, also reflects a tacit acceptance of the government's inability to consciously and effectively address the issue of security. That is, when the highest representative of a security and order State public justifies a criminal's death as a valid option to end their criminal actions clearly demonstrate the futility, inconvenience or inefficiency of other channels or alternate security policy, detract from any effort, I have no doubt, some officers attached to ministerial office have advanced in the construction of concrete policies to adequately address the problem.
Moreover, personally I think a sovereign Immorality of this General that in his catalog of options for the offender, including jail, I guess that is the bonus prize courtesy or card, because if my humble knowledge does not fail me precisely that component of the Armed Forces who have the responsibility to safeguard the internal order of Prisons, in which, needless to say has utterly failed in its objective, because of the inability to control the entry of weapons and also to nullify the power of big criminal gangs operating from jails turning them into a resort, training and shelter for criminals. Our prisons seem to mass graves of the undead, a kind of underworld that seems determined to exert remote control of the outside world and what to ask Gen. Benavides is that, it was evident that We won the battle crime and seized all offensive checkpoints, canceling all of our defenses, then towards this objective should focus their offense, this should be your priority, which is not only necessary to implement an effective mechanism for complete and total disarmament, but this should be articulated with a real politics of transformation of penal institutions that can fulfill the purpose while humanizing fulfill its function resocializing and its goal of social reintegration.
Now it is clear that the security issue is not resolved only at punitive and repressive prison system and anarchy, the issue of security is a tradeoff that requires to be addressed seriously and consistency.
believe that the security of citizens of a nation depends only on the capacity of the police and all its apparatus is naive but also counterproductive if they endorse a purely repressive function without depleting the necessary preventive action aimed at strengthening appropriate conditions of peaceful coexistence. While it is equally imperative to ensure the education, training, provision of equipment and minimum conditions of stability for the highest and most optimal capacity of such police action.
It is clear that Venezuela neither of these conditions has been guaranteed, therefore we have a police force lacking in dedication to service, does not know the scope and limits of his authority in inequality of conditions is called upon to risk their physical integrity against a criminal sector each more articulated, without nor with social and economic conditions that foster its institutional commitment. Under these circumstances, we intend to institutionalize a repressive police erected on a weak moral formation through a process of revival of policing that is born with the firm intention to remedy these deficiencies but while, under the premise of the General, is to dehumanize from before birth.
Similarly, police action can not be assumed on an autonomous or isolated, because the action (though efficient) would be equally useless if it does not have an incorruptible judiciary, fair, speed, ensuring efficient and self-adjusted treatment as part of due process, but most capable of ensuring a fair sentence, which leads to the need for a regulatory body that fits the principles that guide the state, but especially suited to the factual conditions surrounding the offense.
While the issue of public safety can not be conceived as a responsibility of the leaders if he is given the responsibility to assume a top priority of the state, since through it ensures good most valuable human being as it is right to life and the ultimate goal of a nation that is the consolidation of the progress-oriented society and the inner peace within the parameters of respect for the law and social justice, but also requires the subject of Public Safety is addressed on a structural and systematic in all its aspects or elements involved in it.
Pretender
blame isolated and understand that it is a structural problem that we are all responsible party and is also a big mistake. The problem of insecurity in Venezuela is rooted in the levels of violence we have achieved as a society, violence in all its forms, violence that is manifested in the treatment, the loss of manners, in the physical environment around you, in loss of respect for others and the loss of respect for authority, the elderly, the loss of the vocation of service of teachers, police etc, the loss of our sense of humanity, the loss of sensitivity to the pain of others violence certainly occurs in many ways until it becomes unstoppable, hence in a society that has taken violence to life and has become a total anarchy can only reverse its effects by attacking the root causes at the same time attacking the other of the elements that constitute it.
is why we at statements like those of Gen. Benavides, there is the urgent need for society to rethink the objective, purpose and rationale of the Public Security Policies framed in Dibis, and determine whether the path taken to address crime is to prevent or violence, because before the present circumstances double standards would lead to the implementation of parallel actions that undoubtedly contribute to rather than solve the problem would instead unstoppable.
0 comments:
Post a Comment