Male 60s Birthday Speech

UNIT IN A POLARIZED SCENARIO

just a few days for the September 26, the date on which the Venezuelans once again have the opportunity to exercise our right to vote direct, universal and secret ballot. Unfortunately

electoral scenario remains the same as always, a polarized electoral scenario where the third option represents the feel of a sector that disagrees with the ends but has failed so far to capitalize on the strength that allows them to be imposed against them and where unlike the Ni-Ni are known to be the sword of Damocles that fails to fall on either end by becoming the big star of the process.

In this scenario in Venezuela Current is repeated every year, there is no room for construction of the country, much less a serious discussion of ideas, every year we embarked on an adventure election, which more than a discussion of proposals becomes a battle where the objective more than conquerors, for some need is demolished. Hence, even though each process before imposing target for both is to capture the attention of neither-nor, the fact is that to date have failed to beat the battle and continue to represent the sector desired by some to consolidate majority or by others to impose in the election battle.

on both sides have made efforts but not very productive, to capture the their attention, but what they seem not to understand any of the two poles, is that the population neither-nor has different origins, first-voting ex officio, the other irresponsible group that tries to live outside the situation in the country, those whom you no matter the fate of the country they live in parallel and in the world political events have no impact. But there are those who for one reason or another found in the abstention a valid way to draw attention and express their discontent or more a very concrete way of saying they do not feel represented by either of the two factors. Even though I do not share this position, not for me to judge, because I understand that somehow belong to parties who have major responsibility for this discontent, either to the ruling party or to which they form the opposition. This no doubt has given way to a third option that has lined up his entire offensive to both ends to try to capture those who do not identify with them, posing as an alternative way to channel this discontent is certainly inconsistent electoral scenario polarized demands the need to retreat to extremes to ensure a suitable platform to build an alternative free country where they have room for diversity and plurality of proposals and thoughts.

So far this scenario is sadly biased expectations have used to build a real political alternative at the same time has become more difficult will fly up the possibility of the country towards a proposal that goes beyond the electoral landscape.

On the one hand we have a ruling party that combines the action of government in time "future perfect" I will .. I promise I will build ... ... ignores the present and after 11 years is still making excuses in the past. On the other hand we assume the challenge of achieving consensus as the only way to form a block party capable of winning elections, but without sacrificing the interests of each party and its leadership. Thus we have seen that while the official pole revolves around one character and one voice, on the other side will make great efforts to achieve agreement among political factors than by their own ideological and partisan nature have always been adverse to the end no matter who your allies, the idea is to add and add, all that is the enemy of my enemy is welcome, even if my enemy, and build the so-called opposition, willingly or unwillingly we fall back, we come together and dance to us marked the adversary not only repair our differences we focus on our common goal: CHAVEZ and do not work according to an alternative but that we engage strives to be a minority and opposition win this war, a war from every standpoint uneven and disproportionate, a war that requires us to decide, to establish a position and even to support those who once also adversely lockstep.

However despite the differences that were dormant, as expected, because the way we recognize those that separate us from our allies or differentiated, because each party has focused its actions to the political vision that defined, yet despite having fought his own internal struggle, we maintain our common goal, because beyond the confrontation of ideas, the debate must, visions opposite, and the struggle to maintain individual leadership, we can overcome and we finally an election under the slogan of the UNITY and CHANGE.

"Unity is not the best but it's there" and is also the option that guarantees a favorable election result, difficult to assimilate but imperative is to accept it because what is at stake is the survival freedom of dissent against a government with a strong hue totalitarian and repressive, which has faced down all its powers to the whims of one man. Many seem not to understand it and are betting on the birth and construction of a new alternative alternative surely be postponed but that in turn is in the midst of an election campaign where you find the scenario more suitable to achieve condensation. Hence, the so-called third way or independent candidates are in my opinion out of context in a polarized election scenario, there seems even more reprehensible, as are proposals that although there have been built, the same way as ballot are the result of failing to support within a consensus that initially supported. That is, supporting a proposed unit and then whatever reasons, to support a third option in a polarized setting will no doubt prove counterproductive to the interest groups the sector even beyond opposition parties and sectors that comprise it.

On the other side the stage is certainly easier, there are no problems of leadership, there is the only leader Chavez, only he decides, only their ideas are imposed, so there is no chance or possibility for an internal confrontation, at least able to affect the objectives of the leader. Everything revolves around him, his party and his project, going beyond is not allowed for surely upset the electoral platform more than it already has been affected by continued signs of failure occurs in the setting of government which undoubtedly has become the spearhead of the Opposition who spent its catalog of proposals to the background and strengthened its attack on the opponent's weaknesses (Electric-Corpoelec collapse, food containers, PDVAL expired, spill in Lake-PDVSA-Tragedies insecurity, etc).

The point is that this process is imposed by the need to retake the path of unity, which is not meant giving up the individual objectives of each party, which was necessary was the need to redefine our priorities and understand that but Beyond the consolidation of a game was postponed to ensure freedom and democracy in our country, it was necessary to understand that a polarized electoral scenario, although not the ideal, is what we have, the choice is simple .. or we retire or play us, we take the first option in 2005 and have seen the results ... so if we choose to participate q must also decide whether we win or we booked in accumulated losses on our mistakes, unit results we saw in 2007 but no doubt the results of 2008 show more clearly the effects of consensus.

Political parties have made many mistakes, "civil society also has committed, as the student movement has been committed, all in some way or other we are responsible for everything that has happened in this fight. But today there time to make more mistakes, it's time to rectify on the tasks not to dent them, it's time to forget everything, personality, selfishness, work on the country, working on the basis of true unity, a transparent unit, a unit that will lift our patriotism and our float love of country and our commitment to history, a unit that focuses on a single objective, which is not Chavez, but Venezuela, a unit without colors, a unit of all and for all, a unit without sides, a drive that is not disrespectful, not to mess tripping, not back each other, a unit that allows us to restore the greatness of a nation and demonstrating that Venezuela will never be unity defeated by tyranny. Our drive is not the best but it certainly is the only way to guarantee the turnaround required by the country. Posted

with WordPress for BlackBerry.

First Menses After D & C What Does It Look Like

jail or death for the offender ... New State Policy on security?

According to the GNB Gen. Antonio Benavides dead in clashes with police forces can not be included in casualty rates because of the insecurity, because their mode to see the fate of a criminal is jail or underground.

try to condense all the ideas that went through my mind to avoid leaving any out .. and they were so many that are not as spinning them without losing perspective, so that will depart from some premises that I believe contain the background that lies behind his remarks ...

Inconsistency: inconsistency from every point of view, because the mere fact of approaching death as a departure and is inconsistent with the "alleged" humanist essence of this pseudo socialism. But coupled with this, the discourse also disrupts the humanization of the police and prisons to the Minister El Aissami adopted the slogan of taking the position as the office of Interior and Justice. But beyond the contradictions arising of any process, safety is certainly counterproductive, since it exposes to the public so far have failed to define clearly and precisely the principles that guide the policies of security.

In addition to the manifest inconsistency, also reflects a tacit acceptance of the government's inability to consciously and effectively address the issue of security. That is, when the highest representative of a security and order State public justifies a criminal's death as a valid option to end their criminal actions clearly demonstrate the futility, inconvenience or inefficiency of other channels or alternate security policy, detract from any effort, I have no doubt, some officers attached to ministerial office have advanced in the construction of concrete policies to adequately address the problem.

Moreover, personally I think a sovereign Immorality of this General that in his catalog of options for the offender, including jail, I guess that is the bonus prize courtesy or card, because if my humble knowledge does not fail me precisely that component of the Armed Forces who have the responsibility to safeguard the internal order of Prisons, in which, needless to say has utterly failed in its objective, because of the inability to control the entry of weapons and also to nullify the power of big criminal gangs operating from jails turning them into a resort, training and shelter for criminals. Our prisons seem to mass graves of the undead, a kind of underworld that seems determined to exert remote control of the outside world and what to ask Gen. Benavides is that, it was evident that We won the battle crime and seized all offensive checkpoints, canceling all of our defenses, then towards this objective should focus their offense, this should be your priority, which is not only necessary to implement an effective mechanism for complete and total disarmament, but this should be articulated with a real politics of transformation of penal institutions that can fulfill the purpose while humanizing fulfill its function resocializing and its goal of social reintegration.

Now it is clear that the security issue is not resolved only at punitive and repressive prison system and anarchy, the issue of security is a tradeoff that requires to be addressed seriously and consistency.

believe that the security of citizens of a nation depends only on the capacity of the police and all its apparatus is naive but also counterproductive if they endorse a purely repressive function without depleting the necessary preventive action aimed at strengthening appropriate conditions of peaceful coexistence. While it is equally imperative to ensure the education, training, provision of equipment and minimum conditions of stability for the highest and most optimal capacity of such police action.

It is clear that Venezuela neither of these conditions has been guaranteed, therefore we have a police force lacking in dedication to service, does not know the scope and limits of his authority in inequality of conditions is called upon to risk their physical integrity against a criminal sector each more articulated, without nor with social and economic conditions that foster its institutional commitment. Under these circumstances, we intend to institutionalize a repressive police erected on a weak moral formation through a process of revival of policing that is born with the firm intention to remedy these deficiencies but while, under the premise of the General, is to dehumanize from before birth.

Similarly, police action can not be assumed on an autonomous or isolated, because the action (though efficient) would be equally useless if it does not have an incorruptible judiciary, fair, speed, ensuring efficient and self-adjusted treatment as part of due process, but most capable of ensuring a fair sentence, which leads to the need for a regulatory body that fits the principles that guide the state, but especially suited to the factual conditions surrounding the offense.

While the issue of public safety can not be conceived as a responsibility of the leaders if he is given the responsibility to assume a top priority of the state, since through it ensures good most valuable human being as it is right to life and the ultimate goal of a nation that is the consolidation of the progress-oriented society and the inner peace within the parameters of respect for the law and social justice, but also requires the subject of Public Safety is addressed on a structural and systematic in all its aspects or elements involved in it.

Pretender

blame isolated and understand that it is a structural problem that we are all responsible party and is also a big mistake. The problem of insecurity in Venezuela is rooted in the levels of violence we have achieved as a society, violence in all its forms, violence that is manifested in the treatment, the loss of manners, in the physical environment around you, in loss of respect for others and the loss of respect for authority, the elderly, the loss of the vocation of service of teachers, police etc, the loss of our sense of humanity, the loss of sensitivity to the pain of others violence certainly occurs in many ways until it becomes unstoppable, hence in a society that has taken violence to life and has become a total anarchy can only reverse its effects by attacking the root causes at the same time attacking the other of the elements that constitute it.

is why we at statements like those of Gen. Benavides, there is the urgent need for society to rethink the objective, purpose and rationale of the Public Security Policies framed in Dibis, and determine whether the path taken to address crime is to prevent or violence, because before the present circumstances double standards would lead to the implementation of parallel actions that undoubtedly contribute to rather than solve the problem would instead unstoppable.

Cost Of Cataract Operation In Chennai

EACH CURB YOUR DEAD HAVE MY PANA

No doubt that this August has been a bit unusual, you say that Venezuela is what is left dead, but perhaps what makes it unusual is that during this month that culminates just killed two people, emblematic for both sidewalks. First to clarify, not try to create points of comparison between the two, because beyond their beliefs and actions, they were both parents, both were Venezuelans, both as human beings deserved respect during his lifetime and after his death ... both also were cruelly vilified by their opponents and somehow also both were betrayed by many who were once allies said today hypocritically cried at his grave full of false outrage.
A Tascón betrayed its chairman and all day Pharisees who claimed his death shocked the insults of many opponents, pretenders all, turned their backs and their accomplice silence supported his expulsion ... as always said, learned Tascón deal with the hatred of the opposition, but more difficult was to survive the treachery of those with whom and for whom fought. Exacerbated the hatred of opponents was expected, although I confess that I personally did not know how to deal with so much hatred and resentment, justified or not, only revealing the inhuman and cruel side of people, especially people who remain ever been the victim of hate today simply became executioners. I do not really understand, because if what they hate him so much criticize our opponents, not respond with the same hatred that we can overcome it. But the way things are now in my country, a feeling that he thought highly personal individualisimo today it is a collective sense ...
But like everything in life serves as a sort of boomerang in death within weeks missed sidewalk and dragged him to a man who say what they gave their lives for something they really had to believe with all your soul, because no one is sacrificed in this way without a reason. Blackmail theory falls apart with the death of Franklin Brito, no fortune can be compared to family life and are ultimately the most precious of all human beings. This man died with the conviction that their struggle was just and perhaps hoping that it would not be in vain, because he knew the meaning of their struggle went beyond some land, even beyond the indisputable right to property was more a matter of respect and dignity for the human condition and especially a Venezuelan citizen status. Many did not understand their struggle, even so in many ways we express our respect and solidarity, some supported the strike, others tried to stop her, but in the end, like everything we did enough, we signed a petition ... a # hashtag on twitter, but I never saw a horny people protest his abduction, no doubt because the decision to intern at the military hospital against his will was but an ordinary kidnapping of a regime whose authorities have lost respect for the law, for human dignity and even themselves. As a people we gave back in many ways .. because in the end he died alone in the four walls of their executioners chose. At the end we await silent this outcome, we knew we would come and to which simply were not able to establish a decisive position.
the end, none of the 2 sidewalks were able to understand the message, none was able to see beyond the political color of his death, none was able to understand that behind the color was a Venezuelan who by circumstances of life left their mark on this world. . good or bad, sad or happy .. leave traces that are unforgettable because they reflect a conviction.
perhaps from this post thinking that many do I hate comparisons, but like I said, for me are 2 men who lived and died in different circumstances but were vilified and betrayed to the same extent. Reviled by the most genuine representation of indolence and the unconsciousness that has permeated much of society, victims of this hate group that eats away the natural nobility of the Venezuelan and it really despicable beings ... Betrayed by those who turned their backs. . by silent ... for those who took the road of indifference, becoming accomplices of great injustices, betrayed by those who were not able to appreciate their sacrifices ...
At the end of the month each sidewalk had its dead ... For those who wanted to convert them into a banner here Ali left it short of our First
"They will not be with her flag to embrace .. and can not lift that leaves the fight time .. not balk or living legends .. "Posted
with WordPress for BlackBerry.

http://www.blogalaxia.com/tagmaker.php