Decorating A Rabbit Cage For Christmas

Live Webcast Walk

Video streaming by Ustream




In a joint effort between ARCA, FANCA, APREFLOFAS and Country Journal, will be broadcast live over the internet, walk against open pit mining in Crucitas, Northern Costa Rica. Join us and witness as 40 walkers from the communities surrounding the mine, accompanied by environmentalists Costa Rican, Nicaraguan and Panamanian travel 200 km to 7 days after arriving in San Jose, where they will be greeted by a massive concert for life.



Transmission come to you live at the following times:



Monday, 21 August:

12:00 M, 4:00 PM and 8:00 PM



Tuesday August 22 to Saturday 28 August:

8:00 AM, 12:00 M, 4:00 PM and 8:00 PM



(All times local to Costa Rica)



also join us at the following address: www



. arca.co.cr

www.fanca.co.nr

www.nomineria.com

Wii Power Suply Brazil

Tascon ...

Loved by some, hated by others and betrayed by many Luis Tascon be remembered as an emblematic figure of the century polarized Venezuela XXI. Tascon was a man who could say, among other things, that was a strong advocate of the left and firm believer in the Revolution, who lived according to his ideas, which until the end were his guide. A man who bet everything on a revolution that involved a real transformation of the state in all variables, but eventually had to concede that goal in 11 years of government had failed. Still refused to give up his ideal of the country and struggle to build a real home. Many agree
considered the most representative icon of the apartheid regime imposed by the Venezuelan President Chavez from the process of collecting signatures to approve the Recall Referendum of 2004. Was charged directly by the political persecution that was generated with the list, while he became the target of the most severe attack by the Venezuelan opposition and those who directly or indirectly, to date, continue to face discrimination policy for having signed against the president in 2004.
No doubt Tascon list was for a double-edged sword, that the first change, made him the liking and beneplacencia the President, who always considered the leader of a revolution that would lead our country to move towards true social transformation of the state, a project that moved all without hesitation, even its name, being declared sole parent of a list that did not beget, because if you remember, the database of the signatories was published SUMATE that was the agency responsible manage the collection process, as well as being broadcast by Globovision through its website and which can have free access through a sms to 8080. Still did not hesitate to take paternity leave, as he said, assuming responsibility for the good and bad that it would derive. Unfortunately the Tascon list was converted into a weapon of political persecution that went beyond all limits and contributed greatly not only a broken society, but at the same time to the consolidation of an exclusionary regime that made confrontation and hate their best political strategy, hate by the way, everyone at some point we have been party to any of its facets. Unlike many false revolutionaries Tascón lived according to his ideas and loyal to the national project led by President Chavez, committed to the core in the real transformation of the state became one of the staunchest critics of the excesses. And corruption of their own government, which ironically cost him his expulsion from the political party he helped form. Many of those who benefited from that list became the executioners who were the facilitators, experienced firsthand the disrepute by those who once flattered him and those who were "comrades" become his most bitter opponents, enfilar not hesitate to all artillery against them. Ironically, many of these false comrades who turned their backs on the debacle of his political life today so hypocritical and without the slightest hint of decency to criticize the opposition to celebrate his death, other deplorable action, but that certainly has its origin in that hatred exacerbated during 11 years has been planted and harvested in the soul of Venezuelans. At the end Tascón learned to deal with the hatred of the opposition severely beaten and thousands of families who saw him and "his list" the most executioner and therefore their enemy. However, if I could feel something in our conversations was the deep sadness of being betrayed by those who considered his buddies, his comrades and betting everything on a project that never failed to materialize, but above all by the way their leader, the man he admired, which followed, to whom he was always fair, just looked down and paused while the vultures of false Revolution used it as cannon fodder, said in his own words at a time chavez chose between my position and thieves, they won and lost the revolution ... " Still
stood firm in their struggle to build nation, to make a real revolution, with Chavez or not, but ultimately kept the hope to rectify, not had time to tell me if they kept their faith in him or in the end lost as many have already done, but that despite all no grudge against anyone for whom no doubt had become his major executioners. We did not have much time to discuss our differences and positions, but the twitter paved the way and two long interviews or rather conversations were enough to meet the man humble and happy to hide behind the list ... many projects were pending as Infogobierno Act which Cilia Flores y su combo they put so many obstacles after his expulsion from the PSUV, we also stayed pending the visit to the Chamber of the NA, but most of us still pending construction of the country ... still my Pana Tascón that God rest his soul and give peace to your soul, because is that ultimately you may have errors were committed in the name of your revolution and the country that aspired .. Sent from my BlackBerry
Movistar

Rs-9600 Robertshaw Thermostat Manual

The ambitious vision of future green gold


Heidy Murillo Quesada
Vice President - Federation for the Conservation Costaricense Ced
environment. 205220758

At times it is amazing the way as two separate individuals possess university degrees and postgraduate studies, addressing issues of national and international interest in the case that concerns me, the article by Don Humberto Pacheco "Crucitas O CRUZOTAS" leaves no my attention.

Estimating the economic scope of compensation should reconocérsele a mining company in the event of a unilateral breach of the concession for mining Crucitas has no real handle, let alone support a serious analysis of costs, benefits and financial damage derivatives. Mining is estimated, according to public information known, in which 700,000 ounces for a scenario of prices in a favorable market environment can reach $ 1,400 per ounce, which means that the gross sales of the metal may reach $ 980 million. This means that the estimate announced by senior government officials found to be higher by 80% over gross sales for the entire period of exploitation of the gold reserves of the mine. By all means, continue to refer to that amount as true, is irresponsible.

All investments made by the mining to date have been at your own risk, in both who have never had permission to sign, on the grounds that for many years we have not given up contesting in various administrative and judicial means resources have not yet been exhausted.

In a possible application by Gold inifinite to a decision by the national government to prevent mining in Crucitas, it is extremely difficult for transnational achieve a favorable result, as there are different arguments of deep technical strength and decisions have been taken against the grain on the administrative and legal provisions. The final scope of the alleged compensation, compensation should be recognized that the mining company must be set by an international tribunal.

The firm commitment to environmental protection, investment in education and health is what has made our country an example for the rest of the region. We have shown that mining is not necessary to develop, and not me, it is HP's behalf who referred to the quality of the Costa Rican labor with great satisfaction, and tourism, which comes to rest, filled with life, energy and healthy environments to our biodiversity, which has sustained tens of thousands of Costa Ricans, who today can continue their activity because it is sustainable over time, is not exhausted.

Unsustainability which, by definition mining, the exploitation of 10 years only leaves destruction in its wake, where after that time can not perform any other activity is synonymous with "Bread today, hunger tomorrow and it's a foolish bet. In any case, the evidence in the rest of Central America shows that when a mining company withdraws communities are in worse environmental, social and economic than before, and that would cost much higher for the Costa Rican society to promote activities at this time sustainable.

So much so that the cost benefit as a sovereign nation we decide to eradicate the root mining of our country, no doubt, would be positive.

Any decision of the executive power to repeal the decree of public interest and national convenience Crucitas mining project is legal and legitimate process, plus there are plenty of arguments to support it.

face of all these arguments, the fallacy is clearly raising Humberto invoking the argument of "legal security" as opposed to our sovereign decision to expel Infinite Crucitas, supported by 9 out of 10 in Costa Rica. Don Humberto

also refers to arguments based on fear of economic loss for the poorest, Soviet lights parasitic and other epithets converted out of date by at least 20 years when the wall came down and I was 12, as well as a misogynist arguments questioning the decisions of a woman ... No, not worth discussing because they do not come to my height.

Anyway, very concrete evidence about the inconvenience of mining in our country, beginning with the sacrifice of other activities that are environmentally sustainable, socially and economically, this is the basis for sustainable development, as I said before, supported by 9 out of 10 Costa Rican and they do have, contrary to what arises Don Humberto, a very futuristic and very ambitious. So ambitious is that vision, There are many achievements and wealth, which many can not see her in the narrow-minded to earn a return of gold mirrors. Many have progressed, others are condemned to repeat history, we move forward, we are the ones who refuses to make the same mistakes. The visionary and progressive, we see more than gold, green gold see the future.

Episoden Bulma Und Vegta

The resource curse and poverty


Examples Don Jaime Gutierrez cites in his article "the attic is determined to be poor" on Tuesday, August 3 indicate a lack of knowledge about history and reality in Central America and Panama in relation to of Costa Rica. Costa Rica is a country with virtually no mines and no However, in relative terms is much less poverty than other Central American countries where the mines are open pit gold export decades inherited wealth and poverty. There

countries to expel more youth in the region to Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador, and, however, gold mining in the open is an important part of economic activities in those countries. Costa Rica has no channel, but its indigenous and rural populations have a much higher quality of life for the average Panamanian indigenous and rural population.

megadistrito Panama has a financial and also has first world roads but the 300,000 or more indigenous Ngobe people, inheritors of an ancient cultural wealth are totally excluded from that wealth, live in extreme poverty and many are forced to migrate into Costa Rica in search of decent work. Source

corruption. Maybe Don Jaime has not heard about the "resource curse," an analysis that make international leading economists such as Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz. This man explained that extractive resources often encourage corruption and easy money for an elite and mining-based economy creates "rich countries with poor people" (as in the case of Guatemala and other countries in the region).

also suggests that the prices of extractive products are very volatile and distort or not conducive to an economy based on sustainable production and enrichment of human capital. Such is the case of gold in Costa Rica: when the mining company began managing the project (less than three years) the gold was worth $ 300 per ounce, now Don Alfio Piva, our vice president, estimates irresponsibly unnecessary compensation based on Priced at $ 1,200 per ounce. Perhaps

Don Jaime has not delved into controversial texts such as Don Pepe "The Poverty of Nations" where points about the differences between wealth and money and explains why we consider to plant grains and maintain food sovereignty of a country creates wealth.

Maybe then it would be further explanation of why young people migrate Perez Zeledon: Depending on the maldistribution in the land, favored by the concentration of land in the hands of the corporation pineapple, or the abandonment of our policy of food sovereignty based on agro-ecological systems to the detriment of farmers and institutions much loved by our farmers as they were the CNP, IDA and the MAG itself.

Costa Rica was an exemplary country for the region and the world, its wealth based on a comprehensive educational program on social investment in products produced from the plot peasant agro-ecological systems (coffee, cocoa, grains, tubers, etc.). At the time that the economy transnationalized, when the multinational fruit (pineapple, orange, banana) farm families began to move, when we left to the elements of the alleged "free market" of more than twenty thousand peasant families producing 100% of beans that we ate in the mid 80's, then began to open up the huge gap between rich and poor, and started to centroamericanizarnos. Contempt

. Finally, we should remind Don Jaime when it comes to our biodiversity so contemptuous that it was precisely that biodiversity (these "bugs, Alipate and big birds") that allowed and promoted the initial ecotourism in Costa Rica, which in turn attracted hundreds of thousands of tourists every year who have maintained the country's main industry in the last fifteen years.

Bloons App Cheat Pack 3 Level 32

The EU ban on cyanide-based mining

Jorge Mora


Portuguez * On 5 May the European Parliament adopted a resolution (RC-B7-0238/2010) on behalf of the European Union (EU) ban the cyanide-based mining in countries that comprise it. This resolution was issued by the parliamentary body of the Union, but to become binding, the European Commission (the executive) should accept it and return it to Parliament in the form of proposed legislation or policy.

However, in accordance with the answer given by the commissioner of Environment, Slovak Janez Potocnik, to a question from a citizen via the Internet, and without yet known in detail the formal resolution, the Commission rejected European Parliament's initiative.

this decision "invalidates the argument put forward by Parliament? No way. The arguments and justifications that Parliament would remain there, and although it was not welcomed by the Commission, it constitutes a formal resolution of the highest political body of Europe. Members of the European Parliament, unlike the Commission are elected by direct universal suffrage, is therefore in the space of representation is more democratic and representative of the Union. Its resolutions, recommendations, its pronouncements are very important political force. However, unlike the common parliaments, the European Parliament has no bill. You can only know the proposals that have been submitted to it by the European Commission (a body that has the bill in the EU). Then, when the Parliament wants to boost its own initiative any legislation or policy, issued a resolution that asks the Commission to propose, as appropriate, at the same Parliament or the Council of the European Union.

This is exactly what happened with the resolution on the prohibition of the use of cyanide in mining. The European Parliament asks the Commission to propose to Parliament itself and the Council to ban the use of cyanide. The resolution was adopted by an overwhelming majority of MPs of all persuasions (488 votes to only 48 votes against and 57 abstentions).

historic resolution. The fact that the Commission welcomed the initiative of the European Parliament does not diminish the political strength at this historic resolution, or recitals, or their motivations, it happened only evidence of the powerful political leverage with multinational mining companies and their representatives in the various levels of government. To understand why the European Commission rejected the Parliament's resolution, we must first consider its political composition. The European Commission consists of 27 commissioners who represent different parties, of which only three are currently defined as progressive. All others are clearly conservative-leaning and right, low sensitivity to environmental and social issues. No wonder therefore that the European Commission has been leaning against this historic resolution.

Parliament The case is different. It comprises 750 members, with representation from many political and ideological currents that go from right to left, through Green parties, environmentalists, socialists, democrats, centrist and pro-independence, provide a forum more representative of different social sectors that make up the Union.

Is the decision based on valid European Commission to promote mining? No way. According to the commissioner Potocnik, monitoring bodies, current legislation in the EU, as well as the technologies used in Europe for the prevention of accidents involving cyanide. Still, in accordance with the European Parliament in the last 10 years there have been over 30 incidents of this kind in Europe, some nearly graves.Por other hand we have seen what happens in the rest of Latin America, with constant spills in Mexico, Peru, Colombia, Ecuador and other countries in the region. In the case of Costa Rica and we had our first experience with the collapse of the tailings pond in Miramar de Puntarenas mine. Control

weak, high costs. Institutions like SETENA MINAET, municipalities are still too weak to exercise proper control and oversight, our water legislation is outdated, and specifically in the case of Industrias Infinito, which aims to build a mine in the area of \u200b\u200bCrucitas, no previous experience in developing mining projects and, therefore, has never used the sophisticated technology required such ventures.

Even the Bristish Petroleum, experienced multinational oil company, could provide the oil spill off the coast of Louisiana, which despite using the latest technology and most existing control has caused the biggest ecological disaster of humanity.

We can not allow our country to develop as highly risky activity. Our development model has to move towards sustainable use of our scenic beauty of our biological diversity of our flora and fauna, betting on ecotourism, the development of cleaner technologies, industries with less environmental impact and higher profitability than mining The meager profits leaving the country compared with social and environmental costs we all have to assume.

* Central American Action Network (FANCA).

Gay Grand Canyon Cruze

2. LA VENEZUELA your dream ... we all dream!

The previous post visions of 2 showed opposite trends between the two was not clearly possible to build a joint national vision, common to all. However, each from his position made their contributions, outlined an idea, not very precise, but valid, as delineated on the Venezuela they wanted and dreamed.

In this new entry, if you will, I advance a little more in the construction of this idea ... from here, you may notice that begin to have a broader perspective about the country we want, maybe some polarized shades but in essence, each is avoca to show their idea directly oriented toward the country he wants, but most of the Venezuela that dream. Already at this stage we have overcome the obstacle of 140 characters and leave a little aside the issue of polarization, for avocados just to take the first steps in building our dream country.

Fortunately, for the remaining 140 characters or more were enough to share his vision of the country, to express how Venezuela is that they want and dream, without conditions, without cortapizas, uncensored just a few words to express their ideas, which enclose desires and demands in summarizing the basic needs of the Venezuelan group as a whole and beyond its own political orientation, (@ The Vzla to sleep, no I fit in 140 characters. But above all, I want free, legal and personal security.) , Freedom and Security, two words that begin here from repeated over and over again as a reflection of a collective need a society in some way or another feels threatened both his life and interests.

So there are those who called upon the patriotic commitment that requires us putting our country over any other interest (@ A little hard to put into 140, for all q I, but it is a proper and accurate summary Venezuela want is the one where everyone feels first to his homeland and its people. Assume responsibility commitments country. For details, would have to write at length) indeed if anything is to be rescued in this country is the true sense of patriotism, that which goes beyond words, which is not a mere political slogan, but he feels and manifests itself in every act, every action, every step we take and every project we undertake. Not enough to say we're the best, you have to feel, needs to be addressed and above all things must defend (@ @ Trapiello differ from the 140 characters and asked me also tell you "Venezuela is destined to be a power") . Be 1 power, more than a dream should be our compass, be a power in every way, but above all be a power held in a large corporation, a partnership first with first-class citizens. A society we are all part and we can all feel a part, but this can not be an isolated, should be a joint effort (@ building it collectively ...) , allowing us between everyone and everyone's efforts to achieve our goal (@ with all pointing to the same Obj Venezuelans, many education and support to private enterprise, sports and the arts.) A common goal can be constructed even on our differences and guide us in our move daily (@ All Venezuelans united by a common goal; A Prosperous Venezuela. .. regardless of political preferences) A society can be imposed on political differences and where all we are clear that the objective is common to all. a Venezuela that is built every day and which we ourselves who we outlined our destiny (@ No I have 140 characters to describe, but trust me I work every day to achieve it.) Venezuela is constructed so that we want.

Some seem to have lost faith (@ and or) , we can not blame them because sometimes we see the struggle for day to day so uphill that country that everyone dreams feels increasingly distant and impossible. Pensao perhaps because it is a dream alone, became convinced that it is utopia or worse can come to consider "cheesy" (q @ as answer without sounding corny or pamphlet? Capitalist do not want it! I do not want sick d consumption! Something human + the dream) or politiqueron taken from a slogan which is a mistake, for a dream overvoltage country and more humane country reflects the nobility of our soul and is the kind of dreams that is worth fighting, our dreams can not aspirational nonsense, on the contrary should be the first sure step toward what many consider unattainable but in our hearts should be lifted as the great challenge of our life, that purpose that guides and directs every step we take and that somehow gives you reason to us as citizens. Therefore I disagree with those who believe it is necessary to dream of Venezuela who want to build (@ Venezuela does not need dreams, needs and proposed actions to resolve serious problems of Venezuelans) , For the Venezuela that we must first dream it, draw it, paint it on the horizon and define clearly the path that will allow us to make that dream a reality, the grandeur of our dreams is not on the magnitude of what we dream but on the strength and courage that we put to make it happen. Our ability to dream should be proportional to our ability to turn those dreams into a tangible reality to the senses, is a matter of Dream-Want-To, (@ Dream not, I want a Venezuela where we can walk freely without fear, i where we all live in freedom. I want a sovereign Vzla.) be convinced that we have the necessary tools to build our destiny as a society and country (@ TNEMOS BECAUSE THAT I WANT A FIRST WORLD COUNTRY D EXCLUSION ZERO, ZERO IMPUNITY zero corruption, FULL EMPLOYMENT & PUBLIC SERVICE) not that we have to do ... I would say that we plenty to do, we just lack the will and genuine commitment to our homeland, a collective commitment, a commitment. Certainly Venezuelans share a dream of country (q @ I q is the same dream all! As you dream q! Truth, free independent, q there is true justice!) , a collective dream of a common goal (@ Similar to your Venezuela, is a collective dream: freedom, justice, security and progress .. In peace and without poverty! ) , and indeed it should be everyone's dream, a dream to which all direct our efforts, but should be a country dream, a dream for Venezuela.

Beyond the road we take, it is essential that our dreams Venezuela includes us all without exception (@ No differences in the q Vzla dream! But if the path to achieve it: Chavez is not militarism! ! Many believe q is not a route the "restoration" to the past. You have a 3rd q means, right?) , this is not the first, second, third or fourth via, the case that all lead us toward the same goal.

Why a country like ours dreams of being free, being an inherent right of freedom to our own human nature and guaranteed by our Constitution? Freedom can not be conceived as an excuse to fight against that which we do not share, nor can it be limited for the convenience of those in power. Freedom must be accompanied by true sense for us to guarantee their scope and grandeur in terms of progress and stability of a country based on the full development and exercise of citizenship rights.

Some dream of a country specific issues to ensure progress social and citizenship development (@ the Venezuela that dream and I is whole, free and thriving ...;) unit as a nation that allows us to fight collectively for our goals in any field, from something as simple as football preferences (@ Dream a Vzla where "civil society" do not put flags of other countries on Venezuelan soil for a World Cup) and if we have really reached a point where we are able to support global teams above our burgundy or even worse, downplaying our national team and the role that these do represent the country at various sporting events worldwide. It's funny how despite being a country with a prominent and talented youth from all areas, sports, musical, cultural, scientific, etc, sometimes it seems that simply do not care, we like our musicians are highly acclaimed throughout the world and pay great amounts of money to enjoy their talent, while we here prefer to let the wage to an international artist, this shows how little importance we place on our own, to the homemade, the local talent in all its manifestations. We must learn to appreciate the greatness that comes from our land, give our support, unconditional support and trust we give to our brother, our family, that ours is our pride ... and why no, go back to that slogan or tagline that "our way is better".

to ACA has been an arduous task to compile all comments and contributions from fans. For those who wonder why the authors omit is simply because beyond my particular way of spinning each comment, in essence, reflects the feel, the longing, the aspiration of many beyond their political dream of a better country for everyone.

Space Walker Mainboard Drivers

The government can stop mining in Organizations and Networks


On 27 July the Executive reported the alleged impossibility of stopping Crucitas mining project, arguing that the Constitutional Court has given valid and arguing that the country exposed to a million-dollar lawsuit the company Industrias Infinito.

Given this, social and environmental organizations, research institutes, experts from major universities, leaders of various political parties and representatives of communities affected by mining activities, told the public that:

1. The concession granted by the government of Oscar Arias to Industrias Infinito, by order No. 217-2008-MINAE of April 21, 2008, is absolutely void, because the mining moratorium decreed by Abel Pacheco administration remained in effect until June 4, 2008, ie almost a month given after the award.

2. The mining company can not claim to be based on a vested absolutely void and illegal act of the previous administration. All investments made by the company have been at their own risk as to date has never been a firm resolution to authorize it to begin operations.

2. Therefore, the Costa Rican government would not have to indemnify the company mining with 1,700 million dollars as they claimed the presidential palace in the media.

4. In the worst case scenario, the amount of any compensation would have to be established by the courts and tribunals concerned. But never rashly fixed by the Executive whose first duty is to protect national interests.

5. Vice Piva has acknowledged that the mining project will entail serious environmental impacts Crucitas for our country, and Mrs. Laura Chinchilla said that his government will not promote open-pit metal mining. Therefore there is no legal reason, or techniques, or political expediency to maintain the decree declaring the project of "public interest and national convenience" issued by the previous government and supported the concession.

6. President Laura Chinchilla to repeal that decree and to nullify the concession granted by the mining company, as requested by the local government of San Carlos, the highest body representing the local interests of the canton, and with this, real alternatives to communities in the Northern Zone, in line with the sustainable development model that proclaims our country.

7. The government of Mrs. Laura Chinchilla must be consistent with its policy of not promoting more projects of open-pit metal mining, and act putting national interests above the economic interests of a Canadian owned company, dedicated to an activity that in recent polls, is rejected by 90% of the population.

We the undersigned, maintain that this project is not feasible or ecologically, socially, and economically for the country, which entails the destruction of fragile tropical ecosystems that need restoration and conservation. The country will only receive a 3% of the nation's gold in payment for the company for this award.

500 years later continue exchanging gold for mirrors and glass beads

Costa Rica says no to open-pit metal mining

ORGANIZATIONS

Environmental Association of North San Rafael de Heredia

Environmental Protection Association Watershed of
Siquirres Canton Association of Friends of Pacuare


Central Association for the Economy, Health and Environment

Rivers Conservation Association and the Residential Environment Plums

Association of Communities for Sustainable Development Canton Santa Cruz

Indian Development Association Bribri

Social Ecology Association

National Association of Public and Private Employees Association
North


Life Preservation Association and Wildlife

Central Regional Association for Water and Environment
Our Voices


Association Training Center

Development Center Environmental Law and Natural Resources Committee Patriotic Zarcero



Ecological Communities
La Ceiba Country
Digital Journal

Costa Rican Federation for Environmental Conservation Foundation

Neotropica Foundation

PROMAR

Juanito Mora FPM



Preserve Planet Sea Turtle Restoration Program Projects


Alternative American Red Water Action

Biodiversity Coordination Network

Farm Workers and Youth

Plantation Progressive and Popular Participation



Representatives:



Carmen Carmen Fernandez Granados Muñoz Claudio Quesada Monge



Pereira Arias Navarro Gustavo Ruiz Delgado Jeannette





Corrales Jorge Gamboa José María Flores-Estrada Villalta Juan Carlos Mendoza



Manrique García Guzmán Oviedo
Maria Eugenia Venegas Renauld

bristles

Víctor Hernández Yolanda Acuña Castro


Ex-Members:

José Merino del Río Vargas

Maureen Ballestero

Aldermen City of San Carlos Edgardo Vinicio

Sibaja

Eli Araya Salas Herrera Roque

Other personalities:

Abel Pacheco de la Espriella. Former President of the Republic

Carlos Manuel Rodríguez. Former environment minister Otton Solis Fallas

. Former Minister of Planning. Former Congressman Rolando Araya Monge

. Former Public Works and Transport. Ex Member. Rodrigo Alberto Carazo

Zeledon. Exdenfensor of the inhabitants. Ex Member.

Gatgens Allan Astorga. Former Secretary National Environmental Technical Secretariat. Yamileth

SETENA Espeleta Astorga. UCR ProGAI
Director Luis Bernardo Villalobos Solano
. Research Program Health Policy. UCR

Alberto Cortés Ramos. UCR University Council member Jorge Lobo Segura

. University of Costa Rica

Anais Villalobos Kong. Environmental Economist

Diniosio Antillón Cabal.

singer Ana Cristina Rossi.

writer Arabella Salaverry Pardo.

writer Jorge Araya Westover

Mariano Figueres Olsen
German


Fabio Chacón Araya Hernández Delgado Ligia Umaña



Ledezma Carmen Jiménez Contreras Andrea Aguilar Umaña



Santos Valdes Coronado